🔗 Share this article

Families whose relatives laid to rest in graves at risk from coastal erosion argue that a lack of decision over how to address the problem is causing them unnecessary distress about the eternal homes of their departed family.

A Looming Danger to Historic Graveyards

Local authorities have singled out three church graveyards in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being consumed by the sea in the coming decades.

A newly published study on the situation details a range of options, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and relocating them in more secure locations. Officials maintain it is for the community to determine how to proceed.

“Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. My parents wanted this to be their last home, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”

Projections suggest at least part of one graveyard could fall into the waves in the next 80 years, but some residents fear it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” one said.

Haunted by the Past

One resident recalled a school trip to the nearby village of Eccles, which has almost entirely disappeared into the sea, including its place of worship and burial ground.

“You could see human remains,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get carried away to sea. That is not the case. People will collect remains as souvenirs and go plundering graves looking for valuables. That is completely undignified.”

“I fear that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I’d be appalled by that.”

A Paratrooper's Resting Place in Peril

Further up the shoreline lies the grave of a ex-soldier who died while working abroad. His parent said she could not sleep after learning her son’s final plot might one day be relocated.

“It truly disturb me to consider this won’t be his lasting home,” she said. “To our family it’s an important site to visit.”

She believes, new interments should stop but says it is premature to exhume existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an timely resolution must be made when a tipping point has been attained.”

Searching for Solutions and Clarity

An absence of agreement over when and how to handle the problem has left bereaved families feeling frustrated and worried.

Some want more sea defences to slow the unavoidable loss and to permit funerals to continue for now. Different voices contend the moment for moving graves is drawing near.

“The situation is very emotive,” a family member stated. “The official study was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”

A coastal manager said the graveyards were owned and managed of the church authorities. “Ultimately it is up to them to decide the path to take. We are here to assist them through that process with residents.”

He added there was ample time to consider all the choices. “This concerns decades before it begins getting lost.”

“There is no common view on what should happen yet. It requires productive community discussions to discover the right answers for each village.”

The prospect of losing the churches and graveyards was described as one of “immense sadness for the area,” but faith leaders also spoke of a belief in life after death, offering a spiritual viewpoint on the temporal loss of sacred ground.