🔗 Share this article

The ninth circuit court has upheld a prohibition on deploying national guard in Portland, Oregon, following a recent legal decision.

Judicial Panel Concurs to Rehear Legal Matter

The ninth circuit court of appeals decided on Tuesday that it would rehear the legal dispute concerning the executive power with an expanded group of 11 judges. The judicial body also vacated a previous decision from a three-judge panel that had sided with the administration.

Ongoing Dispute Over Military Presence

This order represents the most recent turn in a long-running legal battle over whether the former president has the legal right and justification to send national guard forces in Portland. Approximately 200 federalized guard members have been in limbo since late September when the deployment effort was initiated in response to ongoing demonstrations.

Conflicting Arguments

The federal government has claimed that federal officials at the ICE facility in south Portland were facing threats, while local authorities assert that municipal police have command of the circumstances.

In defiance of descriptions of the city as “war ravaged”, locals have been sharing footage of scenic paths and a thriving food scene, and organizing events such as an protest bicycle event against the “militarization of our city”.

Court Proceedings

The Tuesday ruling came after a US district judge in Portland enacted two temporary restraining orders this period – one blocking the federalization of the state troops, and another stopping the use of any military personnel in Oregon, after attempts to circumvent the initial injunction by calling up out-of-state forces.

On Monday, the ninth circuit panel had put the first ruling on hold – allowing command of 200 Oregon national guard – but the subsequent injunction stayed effective, blocking the actual deployment of the troops.

En Banc Review

The latest ruling means the issue will be heard “en banc” – with both rulings under consideration together – by a group of eleven justices.

“This ruling demonstrates that facts are important and that the judicial system are striving to ensure government responsibility. The constitution limits the president’s power, and Oregon’s communities cannot be treated as a training ground for unchecked federal authority,” said the legal representative in a statement.

“The court is sending a clear message: the executive leader cannot send the military into US cities unnecessarily. We will continue protecting state legislation, principles, and autonomy as this legal proceeding moves forward and our fight continues in the courts.”